[PD-dev] Refactoring Pure Data (2 of 2)
Mathieu Bouchard
matju at artengine.ca
Wed Sep 13 17:19:56 CEST 2006
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, David Plans Casal wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2006, at 03:02, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>>> So for now, I guess we should simply be able to "open" pd's internal
>>> developments to see some kind of Darwinism
>> Genetic evolution has more to do with monkeys on typewriters than about
>> people wanting to make intelligent decisions. (Darwin knew this... even
>> though typewriters didn't exist in his day)
>
> Hold on. This seems to make an argument *for* closed code, and for pumpkin
> holding, and therefore, in favour of Miller's control. Are you feeling ok,
> Matthieu? ;-)
I'm opposing to the use of the word "Darwinism" in this context. I'm not
making an argument in favour of a closed process, I'm making one against
likening an open process to Darwinism, even "some kind of".
What you say seems to imply you believe that only Miller is intelligent?
;-)
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list