[PD-dev] missing file from pd-MAIN and fftw version

[carmen]

> and that is the question: why do we necessarily need the fftw based fft-objects in plain pd and cannot use externals?

> so the only drawback is see is: the objects are called [fftw~] instead of [fft~]; but lo and behold, i vaguely remembered krzysztof magic in cyclone, where a newly 
> loaded class raises itself over an already existing class. while he is using it to overwrite objects from other externals (e.g. iemmatrix's [matrix~]), i don't see any 
> reason why this should not work with internals.


> 
> et voila, does this not sound good?

sounds good. maybe there should be some official policy on the overloading of internals?

> 
> mfg.adsr
> IOhannes
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>