[PD-dev] missing file from pd-MAIN and fftw version

[Miller Puckette]

Yes indeed.  I'm thinking of automatically having new classes shadow old ones,
so that anything in Pd could simpy be "externed" over.  Not sure of all the
long-term ramifications, but I like the idea.

cheers
Miller

On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 08:30:44AM +0000, carmen wrote:
> > and that is the question: why do we necessarily need the fftw based fft-objects in plain pd and cannot use externals?
> 
> > so the only drawback is see is: the objects are called [fftw~] instead of [fft~]; but lo and behold, i vaguely remembered krzysztof magic in cyclone, where a newly 
> > loaded class raises itself over an already existing class. while he is using it to overwrite objects from other externals (e.g. iemmatrix's [matrix~]), i don't see any 
> > reason why this should not work with internals.
> 
> 
> > 
> > et voila, does this not sound good?
> 
> sounds good. maybe there should be some official policy on the overloading of internals?
> 
> > 
> > mfg.adsr
> > IOhannes
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > PD-dev mailing list
> > PD-dev at iem.at
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev