[PD-dev] missing file from pd-MAIN and fftw version

[David Plans Casal]

Hi all,

Sorry if I'm just increasing noise to signal ratio, but how will  
authors who at the moment use frameworks such as Flext, which use the  
inherited pd FFT (at this point) use fftw if you separate it in the  
ways you're talking about? I may be missing the point of course.

d

On 27 Sep 2006, at 17:29, Miller Puckette wrote:

> It's probably all the same if there's one objectmaker that changes its
> behavior or if there are several (just an inplementation question).
>
> Perhaps the new "declare" object (designed to be visible :) could get
> new flags to manipulate the way object names are mapped to creators.
> Just an idea...
>
> cheers
> Miller
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 01:52:52AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Miller Puckette wrote:
>>
>>> Yes indeed.  I'm thinking of automatically having new classes  
>>> shadow old
>>> ones,
>>> so that anything in Pd could simpy be "externed" over.  Not sure  
>>> of all the
>>> long-term ramifications, but I like the idea.
>>
>> How about having several objectmakers with different methods  
>> defined in
>> them?
>>
>>  _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
>> | Mathieu Bouchard - t?l:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
>> | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montr?al QC Canada
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PD-dev mailing list
>> PD-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

--
David Plans Casal
main at davidcasal dot com
http://www.davidcasal.com