[PD-dev] gdb listening to PD

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Nov 12, 2006, at 3:29 PM, Tim Blechmann wrote:

> On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 10:01 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> Hmm, never seen that.  I just got the "pd" process.  Which platform
>> are you on?
>
> did you ever have a look at m_pd.h?

Any reason for this snide comment?  Of course I've seen those  
functions, but never in the context of connecting gdb to the pd process.

How about saying something productive instead?

.hc

>
>> .hc
>>
>> On Nov 11, 2006, at 8:04 PM, Conor J Curran wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Tonight I was trying to hook up GDB with PD. When attempting to  
>>> attach
>>> to PD, I was presented with the following options. Could anyone
>>> tell me
>>> which process/es should I connect to?
>>>
>>> pd_bang                   pd_free
>>> pd_setloadingabstraction
>>> pd_bind                   pd_free at plt               pd_symbol
>>> pd_canvasmaker            pd_getparentwidget        pd_typedmess
>>> pd_checkobject            pd_init                   pd_typedmess at plt
>>> pd_compiledate            pd_list                   pd_unbind
>>> pd_compiletime            pd_new                    pd_version
>>> pd_doloadbang             pd_new at plt                pd_vmess
>>> pd_error                  pd_newest                 pdfloat_setup
>>> pd_fft                    pd_objectmaker            pdint_setup
>>> pd_findbyclass            pd_pointer                pdsymbol_setup
>>> pd_float                  pd_popsym
>>> pd_forwardmess            pd_pushsym
>
> it's not a list of processes, but a list of symbols ...
>
> hth, tim
>
> --
> tim at klingt.org    ICQ: 96771783
> http://www.mokabar.tk
>
> All we composers really have to work with is time and sound - and
> sometimes I'm not even sure about sound.
>   Morton Feldman


------------------------------------------------------------------------

Access to computers should be unlimited and total.  - the hacker ethic