[PD-dev] gcc 4.1 and auto-vectorization
Hans-Christoph Steiner
HANS at EDS.ORG
Sun Nov 19 05:00:38 CET 2006
On Nov 18, 2006, at 8:07 PM, Thomas Grill wrote:
>
> Am 18.11.2006 um 22:16 schrieb Mathieu Bouchard:
>
>> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>>> I really doubt that the gcc devs put a lot of effort into
>>> something that has no effect. Perhaps not for Pd, that may be
>>> true. But they are talking about vectorizing loops, it may not
>>> be the best thing to vectorize, but there are definitely
>>> vectorizable loops in Pd.
>>
>> perhaps it would be a good start to reimplement newbytes(n) using
>> memalign(16,n) instead of malloc(n).
>
> A few years ago i introduced aligned memory allocation in the pd-
> devel branch.
Have you tried submitting a patch? It would be at least useful in Pd-
extended. How big a difference did it make?
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using ReBirth is like trying to play an 808 with a long stick. -
David Zicarelli
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list