[PD-dev] Re: PD-cvs Digest, Vol 21, Issue 30
gr at grrrr.org
Wed Nov 29 16:51:26 CET 2006
While i don't see what that feature might be in these code excerpts,
except the elimination of an unneeded variable and reformatting, i
normally don't spend my time proof-reading devel_0_39. Anyway, i hope
you know what i mean. Merging in 0.40 could be beneficial for all of
us, and i it can be tackled the sooner, the less work it is.
Am 29.11.2006 um 16:28 schrieb Mathieu Bouchard:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Thomas Grill wrote:
>>>> i have been following the latst cvs changes and it seems, you
>>>> are again beautifying the codebase.
>>> Please identify the parts that you consider that I'm just
>>> "beautifying", apart from the files that don't belong to your
>>> part of devel_0_39.
>> Actually, you should know what you changed. Only from the latest
>> cvs digest:
> Actually, I still wanted you to identify it because I wanted to
> make sure that we agree on what it might be, and because the code
> you point out is part of the implementation of a feature. While you
> were writing the above mail, I was writing a mail about that
> feature, because that's something I _broke_ in devel_0_39 yesterday.
> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
> | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
More information about the Pd-dev