[PD-dev] timing of a clock_delay(x->x_clock, 0);
Miller Puckette
mpuckett at imusic1.ucsd.edu
Fri Dec 29 07:01:54 CET 2006
It's indeed "as soon as possible", except that if someone else has previously
scheduled something ASAP that ASAP will get in earlier than yours. You
can chain arbitrarily many clock_delay(..., 0) calls without DSP or event
polling getting in between.
cheers
Miller
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 11:05:36PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> If I issue a clock_delay(x->x_clock, 0), will the registered tick
> function be executed in the same clock tick, or will it always wait
> for the next clock tick?
>
> Basically, I am looking for a way to schedule something "as soon as
> possible".
>
> .hc
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to
> realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either
> change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list