[PD-dev] 0.40-2 code not in CVS?

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

I'll adjust the patches if need be, its not a big deal.  They also  
might just work...

I don't think I added any patches specific 0.40.1, I just ported the  
ones that were in packages/patches and removed the redundant and  
irrelevant ones.

.hc

On Jan 18, 2007, at 11:44 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:

> I never had checked 0.40-2 in.  It's checked in now (tag  
> "stable_0_40_2")
> but now I worry that it's going to cause one or another patch to  
> break.
> There was a byte order bug fix that I'm sure HC has already patched  
> anyway.
> Also, "list length" has the new, "correct" behavior for non-list
> messages.  I think that's all the difference between 0.40-1 and  
> 0.40-2,
> so 0.40-1 is probably fine to use for Pd extended.
>
> cheers
> Miller
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 01:53:53PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner  
> wrote:
>>
>> When I get the latest from the stable_0_40 branch, I noticed that the
>> version is still set to 0.40-1 in m_pd.h.  Did the version just not
>> get updated or are the 0.40-2 changes not in CVS yet?
>>
>> .hc
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>>
>> All information should be free.  - the hacker ethic
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PD-dev mailing list
>> PD-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


------------------------------------------------------------------------

Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is  
related to the telescope.      -Edsger Dykstra