[PD-dev] 0.40-2 code not in CVS?

Miller Puckette mpuckett at imusic1.ucsd.edu
Fri Jan 19 05:44:14 CET 2007


I never had checked 0.40-2 in.  It's checked in now (tag "stable_0_40_2")
but now I worry that it's going to cause one or another patch to break.
There was a byte order bug fix that I'm sure HC has already patched anyway.
Also, "list length" has the new, "correct" behavior for non-list
messages.  I think that's all the difference between 0.40-1 and 0.40-2,
so 0.40-1 is probably fine to use for Pd extended.

cheers
Miller
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 01:53:53PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> 
> When I get the latest from the stable_0_40 branch, I noticed that the  
> version is still set to 0.40-1 in m_pd.h.  Did the version just not  
> get updated or are the 0.40-2 changes not in CVS yet?
> 
> .hc
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> All information should be free.  - the hacker ethic
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev




More information about the Pd-dev mailing list