[PD-dev] Fwd: Request for dev access

[Luke Iannini (pd)]

Haha, please look at the first message in (or the subject of) this
thread... we have gone far off topic : )

Yes, the counter proposal bit was a jab at the fact that the lazy
consensus has been a bit too lazy, and if the consensus is that I am
rejected perhaps a counter-proposal (for my rejection) is needed to
confirm that, lazily.

Finally, does anyone have any opinions on http://code.google.com as a
cantidate?  It would perhaps lighten your load, IOhannes (in that you
wouldn't have to assemble the server at IEM).

Luke

On 3/2/07, zmoelnig at iem.at <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
> hi.
>
> Quoting "Luke Iannini (pd)" <lukexipd at gmail.com>:
>
> > OK, well if this is not quite ready to be discussed, could someone at
> > least add me to the dev list?
>
> man, this _is_ the dev list!
>
> > (or write a counter proposal for my non
> > admission : ))
>
> as hans has often pointed out, pd-community mainly decides on a "lazy
> consensus".
>
>
> i was not aware that you have applied for repositry dev access (but i
> generally leave this to the other, more "organized" admins)
>
> mfg.asdr
> IOhannes
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>