[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Bugs-1655662 ] .xa10120: no such object

[SourceForge.net]

Bugs item #1655662, was opened at 2007-02-09 01:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by stffn
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=1655662&group_id=55736

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: puredata
Group: v0.40.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Matteo Sisti Sette (sistisette)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: .xa10120: no such object

Initial Comment:
Hi,

This seems to happen under "random" circumstances. It happened to me with every kind of patches (simple and complex) and usually NOT in a sistematic manner (that is, the same patch which once triggers the bug, after restarting PD never does again...)

However, this patch that I attach does sistematically make this happen, at least to me under Windows XP.

The following error message appears in the output window:

>> .xa10120: no such object

This particular patch uses "scripting", i.e. it creates and deletes an object in a subpatch iteratively; however, I saw this same bug happen a lot of times with patches which didn't make any use of scripting at all. I attach this just because it is the only one I have that is sure to trigger the bug.

Sorry I can't "isolate" it further.

Matteo Sisti Sette

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: stffn (stffn)
Date: 2007-04-23 11:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1658640
Originator: NO

I can not reproduce it either on OS X using vanilla 0.40-2 and extended
0.39.2 test7 and RC1. Increaseing the number in the msg does noet seam to
provoke the error either. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig)
Date: 2007-04-23 11:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=564396
Originator: NO

unfortunately i cannot reproduce this with your patch on linux with
pd-0.39-2 (vanilla) and pd-0.40-1 (vanilla).


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=1655662&group_id=55736