[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Bugs-1736701 ] [list-len] uses [list length], which doesn't exist in 0.39

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

I generally wait for others to test it before closing a bug.  It  
works for me on my machine, so that's one confirmation.

.hc

On Jun 13, 2007, at 4:58 PM, SourceForge.net wrote:

> Bugs item #1736701, was opened at 2007-06-13 21:21
> Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fbar
> You can respond by visiting:
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/? 
> func=detail&atid=478070&aid=1736701&group_id=55736
>
> Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the  
> comment thread,
> including the initial issue submission, for this request,
> not just the latest update.
> Category: pd-extended
> Group: v0.39.2
> Status: Open
> Resolution: None
> Priority: 7
> Private: No
> Submitted By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave)
> Assigned to: Frank Barknecht (fbar)
> Summary: [list-len] uses [list length], which doesn't exist in 0.39
>
> Initial Comment:
>
> In Pd-0.39.2-extended-rc2, list-abs/list-len uses [list length],  
> which does not exist in 0.39 at all.  It was introduced in 0.40.   
> Therefore, list-len does not work.
>
> (it would be good to look for other 0.40isms that were included in  
> the backport of the list-abs to 0.39.2)
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>> Comment By: Frank Barknecht (fbar)
> Date: 2007-06-13 22:58
>
> Message:
> Logged In: YES
> user_id=569446
> Originator: NO
>
> Additional note: I found out, that last week I forgot to check in a
> similar fix for another patch that was using [list length]: list- 
> compare.pd
> The 0.39 version is checked in now.
>
> Should I close this bug or would you prefer to keep it open until  
> pd-ext
> rc3/final?



>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Comment By: Frank Barknecht (fbar)
> Date: 2007-06-13 22:34
>
> Message:
> Logged In: YES
> user_id=569446
> Originator: NO
>
> Actually I have fixed this in the branch "branch-v0-39-2-extended"  
> five
> days ago by reverting to a previous version, so it should be okay
> automatically fixed for the next pd-extended release.
>
> Sorry for introducing this bug in the first place.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> You can respond by visiting:
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/? 
> func=detail&atid=478070&aid=1736701&group_id=55736





------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----

'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said,  
hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out  
another pink-collar temp pool day.  - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf