[PD-dev] repository layout
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed Sep 12 10:07:38 CEST 2007
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Sounds good, how about downcasing while you are at it, so we have it
> more standardized.
i don't see a real benefit from it.
but then: why not?
(and finally: since Framestein is really abandoned for some years, i
would remove it from the /trunk/ anyhow and keep it living in
"/tags/framestein/"
>
> Plus, what about adding Gem back to the main pure-data repository?
why?
>
> All these changes will cause major breakage to the Pd-extended build
> system, anyone want to help fix it? :D
(please skip to the bottom if you don't want to read that again)
the joys of monolithic build-systems...
however, once we have moved to SVN i would like to make an experimental
branch of pd-extended to re-work the entire build-system into small
(managable) pieces that are modular and survive directory re-structuring.
i know that you are not really interested in that, but probably others
are :-)
fmg.ad
IOhannes
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list