[PD-dev] repository layout

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Sep 12, 2007, at 4:07 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> Sounds good, how about downcasing while you are at it, so we have  
>> it more standardized.
>
> i don't see a real benefit from it.
> but then: why not?
> (and finally: since Framestein is really abandoned for some years,  
> i would remove it from the /trunk/ anyhow and keep it living in "/ 
> tags/framestein/"
>
>> Plus, what about adding Gem back to the main pure-data repository?
>
> why?

- everything else is in that repository
- makes for one checkout for everything
- makes it easy to make branches and tags for the whole shebang
- we are one big happy family :D

>> All these changes will cause major breakage to the Pd-extended  
>> build system, anyone want to help fix it? :D
>
>
> (please skip to the bottom if you don't want to read that again)
>
> the joys of monolithic build-systems...
>
> however, once we have moved to SVN i would like to make an  
> experimental branch of pd-extended to re-work the entire build- 
> system into small (managable) pieces that are modular and survive  
> directory re-structuring.
> i know that you are not really interested in that, but probably  
> others are :-)

I am all for improving things, but it seems that this would need to  
happen before reorganizing the repository.  Otherwise we are without  
pd-extended builds until it happens.  That's not why I spent all my  
free time one summer building the Pd-extended and the auto-build  
farm.  Switching to SVN is not a good enough reason for major breakage.

.hc


>
>
> fmg.ad
> IOhannes



------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----

I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three  
meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds,  
and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits.      - Martin  
Luther King, Jr.