[PD-dev] repository layout

Steffen stffn at dibidut.dk
Thu Sep 13 18:29:46 CEST 2007

On 13/09/2007, at 17.05, Chris McCormick wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:08:27PM +0200, Steffen wrote:
>> On 12/09/2007, at 20.50, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>>> IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>>> personally i think "externals" is exactly the name (snip)
>>> How about "extensions"? (snip)
>> By the best of intentions -- I think that's a nice 'bike shed'  
>> colour.
> I am not sure I understand what you mean by this Steffen (snip)

I'm sorry that i was not clear.

I mean first of all, that extensions is a ok with me. I before stated  
(agreed with Mathieu) that it would be nice if the union of parts was  
not named the same as one of the parts.

Secondly -- this is were the best of intentions and 'bike shed' comes  
in -- i meant to (indirectly) expressed a concern wrt. the discussion  
about the transition, as it reminds me of the 'bike shed colour'  
story. I would like to underline the 'best of intentions' part!

Best, Steffen

More information about the Pd-dev mailing list