[PD-dev] Nightly Builds

[B. Bogart]

I'm curious about other's opinions...

True they seem to use the "stable" etc.. for example if your search for
debian packages. I suppose debian does not release often enough for it
to be a real problem, but perhaps since the files are archived, "stable"
could be referring to something different than it currently means.

I submitted a bug about the 0.40 deb I tried, 0.39 worked like a charm.

No icon though, which would be nice since there is a nice one...

Also the new "10" fontsize looks a bit small for 10, more like 8... But
since its consistent I'm happy!!

Thanks for the effort Hans!

.b.

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Yes, they are up to date.  I was wondering which name newbies would  
> find easier to understand.  In Debian, I think the words "stable" and  
> "testing" are used more.  In Ubuntu, the names are more important.   
> That's why I named them that way.
> 
> .hc
> 
> On Sep 13, 2007, at 11:29 AM, B. Bogart wrote:
> 
>> Hey Hans++,
>>
>> I'm happy to see debs in the nightly builds!!! yay!!!
>>
>> One question though, have the debs been properly updated? As in  
>> etch is
>> stable?
>>
>> I think it would make more sense to use the proper names on debian, so
>> we have an idea of exactly what distro they are for, even when a  
>> testing
>> turns to stable (suddenly).
>>
>> So I'm assuming they are up to date and "stable" means etch!!
>>
>> Thanks.
>> B. Bogart
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PD-dev mailing list
>> PD-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> ----
> 
> Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is  
> related to the telescope.      -Edsger Dykstra
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>