[PD-dev] Gem question on pix_record

chris clepper cgclepper at gmail.com
Wed Oct 3 22:29:38 CEST 2007


I uncommented it which is the correct behavior compared to the original
recordQT object.

On 10/3/07, Tim Boykett <tim at timesup.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi developers,
>
>    is there a reason why the output of the currentFrame
>                 outlet_float(m_outNumFrames,m_currentFrame);
> (which is always 0 by the assignment immediately above it) is
> commented out in
>
>      pix_record :: stopRecording()
>
> in pix_record.cpp??
>
> I have found that using this output, if I uncomment it, I can
> avoid problems with pix_record trying to record things while it is
> still writing out the file. I think this is the problem I have
> been having with PD crashing.
>
> Cheers,
>    Tim
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20071003/5ab81fed/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list