[PD-dev] Gem question on pix_record

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

chris clepper wrote:
> I uncommented it which is the correct behavior compared to the original 
> recordQT object.

i don't know why it has been removed.
however, why don't we just use a separate outlet (or a different 
message) to indicate the end of recording?
i am not a very big fan of ambigous messages...


mfgas.dr
IOhannes

btw: chris, could you please commit the rest of the min/max changes?