[PD-dev] Gem question on pix_record

Tim Boykett tim at timesup.org
Thu Oct 4 18:50:08 CEST 2007


On 04/10/2007, at 5:37 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> chris clepper wrote:
>> I uncommented it which is the correct behavior compared to the  
>> original recordQT object.
>
> i don't know why it has been removed.
> however, why don't we just use a separate outlet (or a different  
> message) to indicate the end of recording?
> i am not a very big fan of ambigous messages...

I do not think that the frameNumber 0 is an ambiguous message in this  
case.

However I think that an output telling us the state of the object  
might be
useful. But perhaps it is just an over-featuring.

chrz,
tim





More information about the Pd-dev mailing list