[PD-dev] Gem question on pix_record
Tim Boykett
tim at timesup.org
Thu Oct 4 18:50:08 CEST 2007
On 04/10/2007, at 5:37 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> chris clepper wrote:
>> I uncommented it which is the correct behavior compared to the
>> original recordQT object.
>
> i don't know why it has been removed.
> however, why don't we just use a separate outlet (or a different
> message) to indicate the end of recording?
> i am not a very big fan of ambigous messages...
I do not think that the frameNumber 0 is an ambiguous message in this
case.
However I think that an output telling us the state of the object
might be
useful. But perhaps it is just an over-featuring.
chrz,
tim
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list