[PD-dev] pdpedia - infobox template synchronized?

[marius schebella]

hey,
I think it is better to have more fields, even if we don't use all of 
them at the moment. some of the original list are very unlikely to be 
used in the future (like release date) and one field (genre) got deleted 
because for genre we will use the category information instead. but I 
personally tend to use "key words" now in the body of the pages and not 
in the infobox as a replacement for genre.
it is possible that the english infobox might change a little in the 
future... for the purtuguese I would say go with the third version of 
your xls. but drop genre and released.
marius.

João Miguel Pais wrote:
>> Ultimately, what's in the Infobox is up to the heads of each language 
>> site.
>>
>> What's in the Template:Infobox_Objectclass is what will be displayed, 
>> so that's the definitive one.
> 
> so I guess there are missing terms in the list that is being translated 
> around? For example, keeping with the 3 sources that I've listed
> 
> 1. - The first dashed box with # wikipedia terms etc. in 
> http://wiki.puredata.info/en/Wiki_administrator_how-to
> 2. - The box in the section "Infobox" in the same page
> 3. - The 1st section of 
> http://wiki.puredata.info/en/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_Objectclass&action=edit 
> [before I've written it wrong]
> 
> , there are some terms which appear in ones, and others who don't. Look 
> at the annexed file, there isn't any version that is really "complete", 
> each version has something missing.
> Unless "released" is an older formulation for release date?
> 
> So it means that the lists that were translated so far should be updated 
> to include all elements of the 3rd column?
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev