[PD-dev] pdpedia - infobox template synchronized?

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

Ultimately, the structure of the infobox is up to the language head.   
Which ones are included are up to the heads of each language, like  
wikipedia.

I think we should not add fields until we have data for them, for  
example, there isn't any data for "cpu use index".

I think "helppatch name" should only be used on the objects that  
don't use the standard naming scheme (i.e. *-help.pd).

Also, the "messages" section might be redundant.  It might make more  
sense to including the messages in the "inlets" section, since  
occasionally, different inlets accept different messages.  (Most of  
the time, messages with selectors are sent to the first inlet).

.hc

On Oct 6, 2007, at 8:37 AM, marius schebella wrote:

> hey,
> I think it is better to have more fields, even if we don't use all  
> of them at the moment. some of the original list are very unlikely  
> to be used in the future (like release date) and one field (genre)  
> got deleted because for genre we will use the category information  
> instead. but I personally tend to use "key words" now in the body  
> of the pages and not in the infobox as a replacement for genre.
> it is possible that the english infobox might change a little in  
> the future... for the purtuguese I would say go with the third  
> version of your xls. but drop genre and released.
> marius.
>
> João Miguel Pais wrote:
>>> Ultimately, what's in the Infobox is up to the heads of each  
>>> language site.
>>>
>>> What's in the Template:Infobox_Objectclass is what will be  
>>> displayed, so that's the definitive one.
>> so I guess there are missing terms in the list that is being  
>> translated around? For example, keeping with the 3 sources that  
>> I've listed
>> 1. - The first dashed box with # wikipedia terms etc. in http:// 
>> wiki.puredata.info/en/Wiki_administrator_how-to
>> 2. - The box in the section "Infobox" in the same page
>> 3. - The 1st section of http://wiki.puredata.info/en/index.php? 
>> title=Template:Infobox_Objectclass&action=edit [before I've  
>> written it wrong]
>> , there are some terms which appear in ones, and others who don't.  
>> Look at the annexed file, there isn't any version that is really  
>> "complete", each version has something missing.
>> Unless "released" is an older formulation for release date?
>> So it means that the lists that were translated so far should be  
>> updated to include all elements of the 3rd column?
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>> _______________________________________________
>> PD-dev mailing list
>> PD-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev



------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----

News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is  
publicity.          - Bill Moyers