[PD-dev] pdpedia - infobox template synchronized?

[João Miguel Pais]

> Ultimately, the structure of the infobox is up to the language head.   
> Which ones are included are up to the heads of each language, like  
> wikipedia.
>
> I think we should not add fields until we have data for them, for  
> example, there isn't any data for "cpu use index".
>
> I think "helppatch name" should only be used on the objects that don't  
> use the standard naming scheme (i.e. *-help.pd).
>
> Also, the "messages" section might be redundant.  It might make more  
> sense to including the messages in the "inlets" section, since  
> occasionally, different inlets accept different messages.  (Most of the  
> time, messages with selectors are sent to the first inlet).

I also think that it should be the same structure in all languages. I  
don't see much point in each language going astray depending on the  
mood/resources of its participants - for that there's the puredatainfo  
already.

But while checking the infobox template, I saw that those extra fields  
were already programmed, that's why I asked if they should be added to the  
template. In that case, I would suggest to remove those fields from the  
infobox structure for now - new fields can be added at any time, after  
they've been "approved".