[PD-dev] overriding "internals"
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Sat Nov 10 09:55:37 CET 2007
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> So for the Pd-0.40.3-extended release, I am planning on trying to
> make the internals available as a library like any other. I'd like
> this work to be applicable to pd-vanilla, so I'd like to discuss how
> to make it happen.
cyclone does something like this (it overrides already registered
externals, which - at this point - are not different from internals)
it is basically looking whether the class-name is already registered,
and if so, overwrites the class-pointers.
however, for this to work, you need first need to call a function in
your overriding new library.
therefore you will probably need something like a "library" (instead of
single, same-named externals)
>
> I was thinking of just breaking out the classes into their own files,
> then compiling things as a libdir. This is pretty easy for most of
> the objects, but I haven't gotten into the DSP classes yet, and I
> expect things will be more complicated there. And [list] too.
funnily enough i have always been opposed when requesting that the
[list] objects get _proper_ names.
>
> One of the things I am planning on doing for the tkwidget library is
> making it have a shared libtkwidget.so which each of the object
> classes uses. Then each objectclass will have its own file, but they
> still will have shared code. If this works out well, I think it
> could be a model for Pd libraries in general.
well, i don't see a reason why it should not work well.
the biggest problem is probably to find a way where the objects will
search for the search-lib (if you don't want to put it into a standard
place like /usr/lib/ or /usr/local/lib)
fmasd.r
IOhannes
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list