[PD-dev] overriding "internals"

Frank Barknecht fbar at footils.org
Sat Nov 10 19:12:37 CET 2007


Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

> On Nov 10, 2007, at 7:45 AM, Andy Farnell wrote:
> >
> > This sounds interesting Hans. The question would be, what
> > is the default/empty behaviour of Pd with no internals at all?
> >
> > Does it just become a framework for connecting objects (the Pd way)?
> 
> Yeah, pretty much.   It leads to the question, what are Pd's  
> essential "reserved words"?

I consider the objects currently in Pd-core the essential ones, if
alone for practical reasons. But also technically they are a good base
selection.

Ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht                                     _ ______footils.org__




More information about the Pd-dev mailing list