[PD-dev] "declare" strangeness in abstractions (0.41 test10)

[Roman Haefeli]

On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 12:41 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
> 
> > are [declare]s in abstractions ignored completely or just the flags
> > '-path' and '-stdpath'? i would expect [declare -[std]lib xxx] to be
> > common practice within abstractions, since it's an odd thing to be
> > forced in the parent patch to keep track of the externals used in its
> > abstractions. 
> 
> Only path settings seem to be ignored.

excuse me, if that is a dumb question, but are there ambiguities with
-stdpath? since this one is always relative to pd, whether it is called
from a patch or an abstraction, i don't see what troubles it could
cause, if it would just work.

why should [declare -stdlib extra/zexy] work, but not [declare -stdpath
extra/list-abs] ?

roman




		
___________________________________________________________ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de