[PD-dev] CVS to SVN ?
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Wed Jan 30 03:06:08 CET 2008
On Jan 29, 2008, at 9:15 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> I think that Asterisk could provide a good model with its
>> "applications" and other plugins. While many of them are contributed
>> from others, they are all options in the ./configure and "make
>> menuconfig" system.
>
> Thanks. :)
>
> However, I'm not sure that our model could apply to Pd. Asterisk
> is distributed
> as one monolithic source package, because it is maintained by a
> core development
> team sponsored by a company. Pd development is much more
> fragmented than that,
> and the source layout reflects it.
>
> Given the way the Pd core is developed and released, it seems that
> integrating
> any other things from externals and so forth into the pd-core build
> system is
> pretty much out of the question. I agree with IOhannes that the
> configure
> script and the rest of the build system for pd-vanilla should, at
> least for the
> foreseeable future, stay only related to the pd-vanilla stuff itself.
>
> However, it's possible that the configure/menuselect system that we
> use could be
> applied to the externals directory. The basic idea is that there
> is a single
> configure script that checks for the presence and usability of
> libraries and
> other system-dependent features than any module cares about.
>
> Then, menuselect (menuconfig) serves a couple of purposes. It
> reads information
> about what libraries modules depend on, or what other modules they
> depend on or
> conflict with, and builds a list of what things to build based on
> the results of
> the configure script versus the dependency information. It can
> also be run in
> an interactive mode (a simple ncurses interface) where you can see
> what modules
> depend on and customize what modules gets built.
>
> If for your specific purpose, you only want to build a small set of
> modules,
> then you could have a pre-made menuselect.makeopts file that you
> drop in to the
> package, and it will only build what you ask for.
>
> Some people really like the system. Others don't like it because
> it is
> "non-standard" and this stuff isn't used outside of Asterisk and a
> couple other
> packages that we distribute.
>
> But, if the goal is to provide some sort of common build system,
> while also
> providing the ability to customize which externals get built, then
> this may be
> applicable ...
I am proposing working together to create one build system that can
generate custom distros. IEM makes their own custom distros and Pd-
extended is basically a custom distro as well. I think we'll all
benefit if we share this work. Right now we have multiple parallel
and conflicting build systems. I think the asterisk build system has
some good examples for what we could do.
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
You can't steal a gift. Bird gave the world his music, and if you can
hear it, you can have it. - Dizzy Gillespie
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list