[PD-dev] CVS to SVN ?

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Jan 30, 2008, at 10:37 PM, Chris McCormick wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:12:13AM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>> IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>> if this is ok for everybody, we will just do it.
>>
>> I'm all for it.
>
> Yay, me too!
>
> (waiting for someone to say "...but what about Git/Bazaar/ 
> Mercurial?...")
>
> Chris.

Actually, wait, I just wrote a new SCM program in Pd!  We must use it!

:-D  :-D  :-D  :-D  :-D  :-D  :-D  :-D  :-D  :-D  :-D  :-D  :-D  :- 
D  :-D

I am all for it.  Thanks for taking this on!  The plan sounds good.   
The only thing I am unclear about is the trunk/tags/branches layout.   
Are you still following your (IOhannes) idea that calls for a flat  
hierarchy?  I think that's a good idea.

http://puredata.info/Members/zmoelnig/pdcon07/SubVersion

/pure-data/trunk/abstractions
/pure-data/trunk/pd
/pure-data/trunk/externals
etc.

As for keeping things neat, I think that asterisk has a nice layout  
(but this can be decided and changed later, right?):

http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/

/asterisk/branches/  (only versioned branches, i.e. 0.39, 0.40, 0.41)
/asterisk/tags/      (only versioned tags, i.e. 0.39.1, 0.39.2, 0.39.3)
/asterisk/team       (folder for each developer's branches/tags)
/asterisk/trunk      (the whole thing)

.hc

------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----

                             kill your television