[PD-dev] DesireData

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

Since DD is a fork, I think it should not be a branch of Pd in the  
repository.  It can be in the same repository, I don't care either  
way about that.  I think IOhannes proposed something like this (but  
maybe something else makes more sense?):

abstractions
doc
pd
externals
desiredata

I expected they would have wanted their own repository so that they  
can control it themselves without having to deal with the Pd overhead  
(adding devs, commit policy, etc).  But I guess not.

.hc

On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

>
> Dear pd-dev,
>
> Should DesireData remain part of the "pure-data" sf-project, or  
> become a separate sf-project just like GEM already is?...
>
> I ask because HCS seems quite concerned by the thought that  
> DesireData might stay in the repository. He seems to claim that  
> moving DesireData out of the repository, would be a way of  
> collaborating with him.
>
> What do you think?
>
>  _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC  
> Canada_______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev





------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----

'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said,  
hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out  
another pink-collar temp pool day.  - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf