[PD-dev] Protecting Pd-MAIN [was: Re: [PD] Problem in os x 10.5.1?]

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Feb 13, 2008, at 3:15 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>
>> Ah, how is that something that SF has to setup themselves?... I have
>> never been admin on a SF.net project, so, I don't know, but wouldn't
>> that only be about whether a web interface is available for  
>> handling the
>> ACL ?
>
> basically yes.
>
>
> What's the SVN equivalent of the CVSROOT directory?
>
> but in practice no.
> there is no CVSROOT equivalent in subversion.
> subversion itself does no nothing about authentication and
> authorisation: this is left for a frontend.
> the usual frontend (the one sourceforge is using) is via http/webdav;
> an ACL needs to made available to the frontend; for apache, this is
> usually done via a special file on the filesystem (which is read by  
> the
> apache-server); more info under [1].
> sourceforge would need to provide a means to write this special  
> file; in
> my privat svn-setups, i haven't found a way to split this  
> configuration
> into a per-repository file (instead of per-webserver) - but that might
> be just my personal failure; this might be the reason why sourceforge
> does not provide any means of ACLs for svn (yet).

I think Matju is talking about the CVSROOT section of CVS, where  
things like 'avail', 'cvsignore', and things like that.

.hc

>
> fmgasd,r
> IOhannes
>
> [1]
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/ 
> svn.serverconfig.httpd.html#svn.serverconfig.httpd.authz
>
> (btw, i think the svnbook is a good read anyhow)
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev




------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----

                             kill your television