[PD-dev] string support and generic types

[Martin Peach]

IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> I am fine with leaving the string patch in this release as it is if  
>> it will be compatible with a generic approach to defining new atoms  
>> types.  Can anyone speak to that?
> 
> does the patch still register the "string" keyword? (and in doing so 
> breaks all other objects that use [string( without the string-atomtype?)
> 

The latest version registers the "blob" keyword instead, but I think it 
is not necessary for it to register a name at all.

Martin