[PD-dev] string support and generic types

[Mathieu Bouchard]

On Sat, 5 Apr 2008, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> exactly! the entire keyword thing is rather a mess anyhow, and i don't 
> think it should be mimicked anywhere. introducing a new atomtype should 
> be enough.

What happens to [t], [pack], [unpack], [route] with new atom types? why?

  _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada