[PD-dev] profiling the Tcl<->Pd connection

Rich E reakinator at gmail.com
Sat May 17 12:32:48 CEST 2008


On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Miller Puckette <mpuckett at imusic1.ucsd.edu>
wrote:

> I rather doubt this can relly help given the way Pd uses Tcl/Tk.
> (I still have a pet idea on the other hand of simply parsing the TCL code
> and passing it to GTK :)
>

All those in favor of a GTK GUI for pd say I.

IIIIIII!

rich.










>
> cheers
> M
>
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 05:26:00PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >
> > Now that I have discovered this bytecode caching feature, I am
> > curious if the changes I made have made any performance differences.
> > Also, matju mentioned that the bytecode caching probably works better
> > if reusing procs, so it could make sense to have sys_vgui calls use
> > Tcl procs, so that the bytecode gets reused.
> >
> > I was also thinking that perhaps sys_vgui communications could use
> > Tcl_Obj references instead of sending whole lines of Tcl, but that
> > might get overly complicated.
> >
> > .hc
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----
> >
> >                                                http://at.or.at/hans/
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PD-dev mailing list
> > PD-dev at iem.at
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20080517/94da4570/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list