[PD-dev] [PD] Building Externals
x37v.alex at gmail.com
Thu Oct 30 07:21:38 CET 2008
I've made a makefile for mrpeach/osc/
This collection is pretty simple as each external is one file, I'm
attaching my makefile, I'm wondering what changes should be made to
form this into the example makefile to use for externals in the svn?
I'm not sure about the use of the word "TARGETS" here but I couldn't
think of anything better.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:27 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
> Alex wrote:
>> I just joined the pd-dev list so i can keep up with this discussion.
>> I added a link to the GNU makefile conventions information to that
>> wiki page. The info on the wiki seems pretty good though I don't
>> quite understand the Makefile.extended... it is my understanding that
>> these new makefiles are not simply for 'extended', they are an effort
>> to remove the 'extendedness' requirement that exists there. It seems
>> to me that eventually each external should have one file simply called
>> "Makefile"... maybe the existing makefiles should be renamed to
>> Makefile.something in the mean time?
> the idea is, to allow people to maintain their own build-systems fit to
> _their_ own needs for their externals.
> having a separate naming would just not interfere with these.
> (there are people who are quite allergic to other people f*ing up their
> build-systems, even if everything is by the best intentions)
> in the "ideal" world, Makefile.extended would just "include Makefile" and
> they would be the same.
> with the noteable difference, that
> - "Makefile" would contain the actual build-system
> - "Makefile.extended" would serve as a flag to indicate that this external
> should be included in "full" builds.
> for those externals with no existing Makefile, doing this Makefile will
> definitely be the first step.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 608 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Pd-dev