[PD-dev] pd-devel 0.42 (was Re: pd-devel status report)

[Miller Puckette]

Well, I'm using the ddd stuff in an extern I haven't released.  My intent
has been to rewrite all the Pd dialogs using ddd once it was stable.
But now that other folks are working on the tk code I'll just wait to
see what they propose.

I'm split between the idea of incorporating pd.tk changes piecemeal or as
a lump.  If the latter, it would be important not to make too many changes
to the pd/tk interface...

cheers
Miller

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:39:13AM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> >Steffen Juul wrote:
> >>That aside. Just making sure: This devel branch is branching of vanilla
> >>0.41-4 and the only focus is the gui (as opposed to also merging
> >>devel-0.39 features)?
> >
> >
> since 0.42 is just out, shouldn't all work be based on that?
> 
> 
> afaict, most changes in pd.tk from 0.41 to 0.42 seem to be pretty trivial.
> once i am able to get pd-devel running (i haven't re-tried yet), i would 
> volunteer to incorporate these changes
> 
> @ miller: afaics the data driven dialogs (ddd) are only in a concept 
> stage, they are not used anywhere yet. is this correct?
> if so, i would just ignore them for now :-)
> 
> 
> @ pd-devel-team:
> iirc, the idea of pd-devel so far was to not tuch any c-code but only 
> the tcl/tk side of things. how true is this? (i noticed quite a lot of 
> affected C-files; i really hope this will not make the attempts of 
> pd-devel void (i thought the deal was making pd-gui.tk usable should not 
> force miller to accept changes on the C-side)
> 
> fgamsdr
> IOhannes



> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev