[PD-dev] pd-devel 0.42 (was Re: pd-devel status report)

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at eds.org
Tue Jan 13 22:15:04 CET 2009

On Jan 13, 2009, at 3:39 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> Steffen Juul wrote:
>>> That aside. Just making sure: This devel branch is branching of  
>>> vanilla
>>> 0.41-4 and the only focus is the gui (as opposed to also merging
>>> devel-0.39 features)?
> since 0.42 is just out, shouldn't all work be based on that?
> afaict, most changes in pd.tk from 0.41 to 0.42 seem to be pretty  
> trivial.
> once i am able to get pd-devel running (i haven't re-tried yet), i  
> would volunteer to incorporate these changes

Honestly, I would like to wait until the dust settles on 0.42.  If  
there aren't major changes to u_main.tk in 0.42 and right now we  
aren't changing the C side, then I don't think there is any rush.


> @ miller: afaics the data driven dialogs (ddd) are only in a concept  
> stage, they are not used anywhere yet. is this correct?
> if so, i would just ignore them for now :-)
> @ pd-devel-team:
> iirc, the idea of pd-devel so far was to not tuch any c-code but  
> only the tcl/tk side of things. how true is this? (i noticed quite a  
> lot of affected C-files; i really hope this will not make the  
> attempts of pd-devel void (i thought the deal was making pd-gui.tk  
> usable should not force miller to accept changes on the C-side)
> fgamsdr
> IOhannes
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


                             kill your television

More information about the Pd-dev mailing list