[PD-dev] stripping down Pd-extended's default libs
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Feb 16 20:40:37 CET 2009
ydegoyon at free.fr wrote:
>> hmm, they would all remain in the distribution, they would just not be loaded
> by default.
>> the patch-author would have to load libraries explicitly, which would make it
> (hopefully) more compatible with other distributions of Pd.
> not exactly true, precisely the loading library from within the patch
> is exactly the less compatible feature between pd's versions,
> if ever it really works for good in one version
> all i know that really works is with -lib ...
you know, this is all because of nameclashes.
if there weren't any, then there would be no need for Pd-extended
organizing objects in a directory-structure, and everything would be
flat and flurry.
>> most modern programming languages do not implicitly include 3rd (or even 1st)
> party libraries (even though they are included in the standard distro); see
> java, perl,...
> it was perfectly perl-like when obkect were left in extra
> and didn't need explicit loading..
i'm not a big perl-programmer, but they are using a lot :: magic for
loading objects from Modules. isn't this comparable?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Pd-dev