[PD-dev] stripping down Pd-extended's default libs

Loic Kessous loic.kessous at gmail.com
Tue Feb 17 10:50:31 CET 2009

I totally agree with this point , I think it's one of the most  
important thing to care about.

>  As a user I
> would rather do the research to see which externals I needed than to
> be forced into accepting one or the other, ESPECIALLY if vanilla
> classes are overwritten -- this seems the most egregious to me.
> Pd+libs and Pd-extended should support vanilla patching, since many
> users insist upon vanilla only -- worrying about cyclone and allowing
> vanilla to break seems to me to be putting the cart before the horse
> with regard to backward compatibility.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20090217/8811ca65/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pd-dev mailing list