[PD-dev] pow~ in Cyclone [was: Re: stripping down Pd-extended's default libs]

Roman Haefeli reduzierer at yahoo.de
Thu Feb 19 00:49:40 CET 2009

On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 19:28 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >>
> >> this is both with (an imagined) Pd-extended 0.42
> > 
> > Would this be any different with a Pd-vanilla+libs 0.42?  I don't  
> > think there is anything particular to the Pd version in Pd-extended  
> > that would cause this, but instead the way the libraries are built.
> >
> no of course not.
> my entire point was to show that it depends on the version of Pd (prior 
> or post 0.42) rather than the flavour (vanilla or extended or whatever)

sorry for causing confusion. when i speak about differences in
pd-extended and pd vanilla i usually refer to the way of how libraries
in pd-extended are built and not to any difference in the core of
pd-extended and pd vanilla (which might doesn't exist anyway). so when i
mentioned an 'incompatibility between pd-extended and pd vanilla', i
actually meant to say 'an incompatibility caused by different ways of
how libraries are built'. i'll try to make that more clear in the


Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de

More information about the Pd-dev mailing list