[PD-dev] pow~ in Cyclone [was: Re: stripping down Pd-extended's default libs]

[Mathieu Bouchard]

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> yesterday when i went home i was wondering about (i guess) the same 
> thing: could sending [foo bar( to [unpack s s] be actually considered a 
> bug in the patch (for sending a non-list to [unpack]) and "unpack" 
> itself (for accepting non-lists)?

with a circuit-bending attitude and without a spec, features and bugs 
often can't be told apart.

> the help-patch clearly speaks of "lists of atoms", but doesn't mention other 
> messages at all.

So why does the pd source spend 12 lines defining pack_anything ?

  _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec