[PD-dev] why using vanilla better than extended; was :Re: pow~ in Cyclone [was: Re: stripping down Pd-extended's default libs]

Frank Barknecht fbar at footils.org
Mon Feb 23 10:04:25 CET 2009

cyrille henry hat gesagt: // cyrille henry wrote:

> this is what i was thinking for the last 5 year. i don't say that this
> will never change.  anyway, i really appreciate the work made on
> pd-extended, but it is not ready for me yet.  i know that my position
> is a bit extreme, but i don't really have problem with it.

I have a similar position. :)

To me the problem of Pd-extended or the reason why I don't use it is
because it is not only a collection of externals and abstractions, but
it also bundles it with a modified, often out-of-date version of Pd
into a big monolithic package.


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list