[PD-dev] pbank in build/src (aka "flatspace")

cyrille henry cyrille.henry at la-kitchen.fr
Wed Feb 25 11:07:58 CET 2009

João Pais a écrit :
>>>> when pd-extended or the cvs will be ordered to have directory
>>>> like : /math
>>>> /audio/math
>>>> /audio/effect
>>>> /save
>>>> /matrix
>> but i would prefer to organise this properly (i.e. not by developer 
>> but by functionality)
>> for now, using flatspace is the only way i know to include code in 
>> pd-extended, i'll digg more when i'll get time.
> is something like this possible: each developer drops his stuff in svn 
> in the current structure, but when compiled all externals are divided 
> into categories (e.g. like the above named)? each developer has his own 
> corner to drop stuff, but he has to check to which category each object 
> belongs to, and they get distributed at compiling time. and, unchecked 
> objects don't get compiled.
> is this feasible/logic? it sounds logic to me, as f.e. my abstractions 
> cover a bit of everything: GUI, midi, audio, ...
> Also, the amount of categories should be discussed, and probably on the 
> main list. I think that MP's original list isn't enough, and new 
> categories should be included (especially considering the amount and 
> diversity of objects in pd-ext). audio filters, generators, effects, ... 
> I can look at the pd-ext-list I've made and give a concrete suggestion 
> in the next days, if you want.
> this discussion will be a bit chaotic, but it should go to the main 
> list/pdpedia.

yes,i think such proposition can be constructive.


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list