[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-2746054 ] hard-code default user-install paths
IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Apr 13 22:31:15 CEST 2009
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2009, at 6:21 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> shouldn't it be a folder "Pd" as well? (to avoid confusion)
> There was extensive discussion on this topic in the past, and there was
> agreement on ~/pd-externals/. Check the archive for details.
the topic mainlyy focused on ~/.pd vs ~/pd and i follow all the
arguments back then.
however, what i really wanted to ask (and what i actually did ask; i
only eventually got caught by ~/.pd and wrote a bit too lengthy on
that...; however i did mention that it had been discussed before :-)) is
why both w32 and osx have a .../Pd folder whereas on linux it is
why is it not ~/pd ?
re-reading the entire thread from back then does not kindle the
impression that any agreement was made for "~/pd-externals" (though
there was agreement not to hide the directory)
More information about the Pd-dev