[PD-dev] nightly builds for standalone libraries

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at at.or.at
Thu Oct 8 21:55:43 CEST 2009


I'm not likely to use them in a project any time soon, but with this  
Mac OS X release, I can give them to my students who are playing with  
computer vision.

About stability, I mostly mean the API rather than crashing, etc.

.hc

On Oct 8, 2009, at 1:51 PM, ydegoyon at free.fr wrote:

> after the one week workshop,
> i can say they are very stable,
> maybe still a few problems on OSX,
> as we don't test so much there,
> maybe you could help?
>
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> How stable are the opencv objects? Do you think the API will still  
>> change? It would be nice to have them included in Pd-extended, but  
>> doing it too soon creates a lot of annoying work.
>>
>> .hc
>>
>> On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:57 AM, ydegoyon at free.fr wrote:
>>
>>> pdp_opencv and pix_opencv have the autotools working
>>>
>>>
>>> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So far I've been working on an autotools build system for pd  
>>>> itself, not libraries. I haven't used autotools in libraries, so  
>>>> I don't really know what a template would look like. I guess  
>>>> pdvjtools would be a good library to test out those ideas.
>>>>
>>>> .hc
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:11 AM, dmotd wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hans,
>>>>>
>>>>> as an aside, what progress are you
>>>>> making on an automake template, do you
>>>>> have something that could be easily
>>>>> reapplied to various situations for pd
>>>>> libs?
>>>>>
>>>>> there seem to be a few strategies, the
>>>>> iem builders (iem16/iemmatrix/zexy) for
>>>>> one, bryan jurish's moocow builders and
>>>>> a set made by tim blechmann (used with
>>>>> flext).
>>>>>
>>>>> i still need to spend some time with the
>>>>> docs before i get into autotools
>>>>> propper. and any info would be useful.
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> dmotd
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Programs should be written for people to read, and only  
>>>> incidentally for machines to execute.
>>>> - from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pd-dev mailing list
>>>> Pd-dev at iem.at
>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> "Free software means you control what your computer does. Non-free  
>> software means someone else controls that, and to some extent  
>> controls you." - Richard M. Stallman
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-dev mailing list
>> Pd-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>>
>>
>





----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally  
for machines to execute.
  - from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs





More information about the Pd-dev mailing list