[PD-dev] changes in atom_getsymbol between pd 0.40-3 and 0.42.4?

[martin.peach at sympatico.ca]

ben wrote:

> ...
> So that worked for getting the proper value, but the method I was using
> to get the second argument (argv+1) no longer works. Presumably because
> the "next" location is no longer the same.
> ...

Do you mean after you copied the data? Did you try either

threadargs->argv[1]

or

*(threadargs->argv+1)

? They should both give the value of the second argument.



Martin