[PD-dev] changes in atom_getsymbol between pd 0.40-3 and 0.42.4?

[B. Bogart]

Yes after copying.

gcc does not like either, both result in:

error: incompatible type for argument 1 of 'atom_getint'

This is the old way:

intValue = atom_getint( ((gphoto_gimme_struct *)threadArgs)->argv+1 );
				post("in: config value: %d", intValue);

and I tried both these:

intValue = atom_getint( *(((gphoto_gimme_struct *)threadArgs)->argv+1) );

intValue = atom_getint( ((gphoto_gimme_struct *)threadArgs)->argv[1] );

Same thing happens when I try to access the second argument from the 
wrapper function, from the threadargs struct.

.b.



martin.peach at sympatico.ca wrote:
> ben wrote:
> 
>> ...
>> So that worked for getting the proper value, but the method I was using
>> to get the second argument (argv+1) no longer works. Presumably because
>> the "next" location is no longer the same.
>> ...
> 
> Do you mean after you copied the data? Did you try either
> 
> threadargs->argv[1]
> 
> or
> 
> *(threadargs->argv+1)
> 
> ? They should both give the value of the second argument.
> 
> 
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
>