[PD-dev] Raising ~250 USD for the Pd build farm? (was Re: buildbot or some other proper build automation)
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at at.or.at
Mon Aug 30 01:18:28 CEST 2010
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 21:10 +0200, András Murányi wrote:
> > > > so... (tada.wav) Vanilla builds alrite
> > > > on one slave. Nest step would be
> > > > uploading the file, this can be done
> > > > internally, just tell me please which
> > > > file or directory is the actual build?
> > > > And... how do we make a package with the
> > > > Vanilla source? Sorry I never built it
> > > > myself.
> > > > Some more questions that came up
> > > > meanwhile: Shall we update or copy the
> > > > source each time? (see
> > > > http://buildbot.net/buildbot/docs/latest/Source-Checkout.html) Do we need --enable-jack to configure Vanilla (after autogen)?
> > > >
> > > > Andras
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The way that this would be super useful is
> > > if buildbot builds after every commit to
> > > SVN or git. It looks like SVN polling
> > > support is built-in
> > >
> > >
> > > http://buildbot.net/buildbot/docs/0.7.12/#SVNPoller
> > >
> > >
> > > For git, it supports checkout, but there
> > > are some external scripts for polling:
> > >
> > >
> > > http://buildbot.net/buildbot/docs/0.7.12/#Git
> > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/645430/have-buildbot-poll-a-git-repository-for-new-commits
> > > http://buildbot.net/trac/ticket/130
> > >
> > >
> > > .hc
> > >
> > >
> > > yes, git is more cumbersome when it comes to
> > > polling, so i will work this out with daily builds
> > > and see the polling stuff after. the older
> > > buildbot version also has some limitations in this
> > > direction.
> >
> >
> > I think we can start with SVN since that should be
> > easier. If that works nicely, then we can struggle
> > to get git polling working.
> >
> > Alrite. My box may fall out then, because i cannot handle so
> > many build cycles per day, or i'll try to find a way to
> > limit it to one build cycle on 'civilian' boxes like mine.
> >
>
>
> Ah yes, that makes sense. I was thinking the full time
> machines.
>
> > Or, we could raise money for a 64-bit box? 195 USD is not
> > much...
> > http://cgi.ebay.com/Sun-Microsystems-Sun-Fire-X2100-1-8Ghz-512-RAM-NEW-/140441798951?pt=COMP_EN_Servers
> >
>
>
> Or a Dell Zino for 250 USD, its 64-bit and runs Debian/Ubuntu
> nicely.
>
>
> http://www.dell.com/us/en/home/desktops/inspiron-zino-hd/pd.aspx?refid=inspiron-zino-hd&cs=19&s=dhs
>
>
>
> Cool. The X2100 is basically identical to the Ultra20 i have, it's a
> Tyan main board with Opteron - and runs Debian/Ubuntu nicely :o)
>
> How do we raise the funds? Is there an established way, or idea how to
> do it?
>
> Andras
It would be nice to have a 64-bit Debian machine with a bunch of
chroots, both 32-bit and 64-bit, Debian and Ubuntu. I suppose it might
also be possible to have Fedora, Gentoo, etc. chroots if someone wanted
to take that on.
A big part of that question is also: who is going to build and maintain
this machine? I'm overloaded as it is.
.hc
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list