[PD-dev] Debian packaging: multi-object/single-file libraries or single-object/multiple-files libraries?

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

I'm fine with whatever you want to do with iemmatrix.  I haven't used  
it, so I don't really have much input on it.

As for other libraries without aliases or hexloader needs (which is  
most), I see no reason why the Debian package should not be built with  
single_object.pd_linux.  With the libdir loader, it'll behave just  
like a multi-object.pd_linux library, and have the added bonus of  
working namespace prefixes.

.hc

On Nov 11, 2010, at 7:15 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:

> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 10:49 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
>> anyhow, until pd-hexloader is packaged, this discussion is quite moot
>> anyhow.
>
> I could take care of packaging hexloader, but I feel you think there  
> are
> other issues than with packaging. What are those? Is it still defunct?
> Since I fixed iemmatrix in Pd-extended, I had the feeling that it  
> works
> quite well for iemmatrix.
>
>
>> though now i have created some ITPs for various iem-packages,  
>> including
>> iemmatrix ;-)
>
> Good.
>
> Roman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"A cellphone to me is just an opportunity to be irritated wherever you  
are." - Linus Torvalds