[PD-dev] double precision Pd: .patch files, tests and benchmarks

András Murányi muranyia at gmail.com
Tue Oct 4 16:19:58 CEST 2011


On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 18:26, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at> wrote:

>
> On Oct 3, 2011, at 12:04 PM, katja wrote:
>
>  On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Do you have access to an ARM
>>> machine?  If not, I could probably get one online with ssh access, if
>>> that's
>>> useful.
>>>
>>
>> I've mailed Joe White with the question if he can patch the code for
>> libpd and check performance on ARM. He has done some extremely popular
>> RjDj apps and needed to optimize for them as well. Think it would be
>> good anyway to keep in touch with libpd users and app programmers
>> about this topic, even though we're in an early stage with it.
>>
>
>
> Yes definitely, we should let everyone who wants to be get involved.  I am
> just saying with need a development platform to start with.  Once that's
> nailed down, we can deal with more issues, like porting to libpd, dealing
> with externals that could be either 32-bit or 64-bit, etc.
>
> I setup a nightly build on the macosx106-x86_64 and called it pd-double.
>  Andras and r33p, if you are listening, could you run this build on your
> 64-bit boxes also?  All you need to do is:
>
> ~pd/auto-build
> cp -a pd-extended pd-double
>
>
Listening now.
I did:
$ cd ~pd/auto-build
$ sudo cp -a pd-extended pd-double
What's next? Shall I try patching or rather pull IOhannes's  sources?

Andras
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20111004/56db1600/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list