[PD-dev] Fwd: per-thread storage in Pd in support of pdlib - discussion?

[Peter Brinkmann]

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Rich E <reakinator at gmail.com> wrote:

> I do think it is important to separate these things into bite size chunks
> (I think IOhannes mentioned this as well during his LAC talk).  Peter, your
> blog post talks of creating an API for editing patches (here<http://nettoyeur.noisepages.com/2012/01/refactoring-pure-data/>),
> and while I look forward to these capabilities, I think this is also a
> separate job as to the one Miller proposed on this thread, which I see as
> taking care of the static state in pd.  I don't think I could prioritize
> these two different jobs, but I'd say multiple instances allows us to
> definitively crush max, as we'll have a pd vst. :)


I harbor no hostility to Max, but I agree that getting rid of global state
and allowing multiple instances should be the first order of business.  Any
ideas?
Cheers,
     Peter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20120202/0069026b/attachment.htm>